In this chapter, the Battle of the Ages end with
Mystery Babylon defeated. Yahusha emerges from the fray covered in blood
riding a white horse and he is called The Fulfillment of the Word (found
in The Heavenly Scroll).
-
The marriage between the Bride (the
Elect)
who has prepared herself and clothed in white linen, and the Groom (the
Messiah)
is consummated on Yom Kippur (Revelation
19:5–10).
-
Yahusha who holds the title Immanuel “faithful and true witness”
rides in on a white horse. "With Justice he makes war" (Revelation
19:11).
Yahusha the Messiah is the rider mentioned in chapter twelve. John
references Psalm 2:9 "He will rule them with an iron scepter" (Revelation
19:15).
-
The war begins between the children of Yahuah and the world. When
the war is won, the Beast
and the false prophet (Pope)
are cast into the metaphorical “lake of fire”. The rest of the dead
are not laid to rest, but left out for “the Great Supper” a final
offering. (Revelation
19:20–21).
-
The Army of Yahuah made up of its King Yahusha and the rest of the
Children of Yahuah return to rule the Earth dressed in fine linen
riding white horses with Crowns.
For more on Yahusha being the fulfillment of the Word proclaimed in The
Heavenly Scroll, not “the Incarnate Word of God” as in the pagan
philosophy of “word became flesh” see my book
The Testimony of Yahuchanon.
Click here
Yahusha is the
fulfillment of the Word of Yahuah written in the stars. That is what the
Book of Revelation and Gospel of John Chapter 1 (both written by the
same guy) is all about! He is not the personification of the Word or
Incarnation of the Word. That is pagan.
As you can see below,
the Doctrine of Incarnation that led to the acceptance of the pagan
Babylonian Trinity through syncretism did not come about until 4
centuries after Yahusha lived and died. That false doctrine that
Yahusha is literally "Logos" or “Word of God” in the flesh and not the
fulfillment of Yahuah's predestined plan written in the stars evolved in
the 4th Century through the "tradition
and reasoning" under the influence of
pagan Greek philosophers such as Plato...
The Abingdon
Dictionary of Living Religions,
page 767, tells us:
TRINITY (Ch). The
Dogma, formulated authoritatively in fourth century church Councils,
that Christians worship one God in three persons (Father, Son, Holy
Spirit) and one substance. Under pressure to explain to a hostile Roman
world how Christians counted themselves monotheists, Christian
apologists (notably Justin Martyr, d. 165)
combined Johannine
and Stoic-Platonic understanding of the term Logos
("Reason," or "Word") in order to maintain that the Son was both God's
own self-expression and a being distinct from him.
So, we read above The Trinity was justified not
through the Word of Yahuah (because it cannot be it is Blasphemy)
it was justified using Hellenism or the “combined Johannine and Stoic
Platonic” pagan philosophy of the term “Logos”.
We read below that
the term logos
was defined by Christians
according to the interpretations of pagan influenced philosophers in
order to promote a false pagan God-savior:
Encyclopedia
Britannica,
Volume 7, page 449.
LOGOS (Greek:"word,
"reason, or plan"), plural logoi, in
Greek philosophy and
theology,
the divine reason implicit in the cosmos, ordering it and giving it form
and meaning.
Though the concept
defined by the term logos is found in Greek, Indian, Egyptian, and
Persian philosophical and theological systems,
it became particularly significant in Christian writings and doctrines
to describe or define the role of Jesus Christ as the principle of God
active in the creation and the continuation structuring of the cosmos
and in revealing the divine plan of salvation to man. It thus underlies
the basic Christian doctrine of the pre-existence of Jesus…
The identification of
Jesus with the logos was further developed in the early church but more
on the basis of Greek philosophical ideas than on Old Testament
motifs.
The concept of
Logos was based on
Greek
philosophical ideas
not on any prophecy or Old Testament “motifs” or Hebrew understanding at
all. It is a pagan philosophy of Hellenism.
The Religions of Ancient Greece and Babylonia
clearly tells us that the Greek philosophical ideas were developed in
Alexandria, Egypt from the pagan Babylonian mystery religions. These
ideas pertaining to the meaning of
Logos
penetrated as a result of modern religious thought through the
philosophy of Greece and Egypt.
The Religions
of Ancient Greece and Babylonia,
by A. H. Sayce. pages 229-230
Many of the
theories of Egyptian religion, modified and transformed no doubt, have
penetrated into the theology of Christian Europe, and form, as it were,
part of the woof in the web of modern religious thought. Christian
theology was largely organized and nurtured in the schools of
Alexandria, and Alexandria was not only the meeting place of East and
West, it was also the place where the decrepit theology of Egypt was
revivified by contact with the speculative philosophy of Greece.
Perhaps, however, the indebtedness of Christian theological theory to
ancient Egyptian dogma is nowhere more striking than in the doctrine of
the Trinity. The very terms used of it by Christian theologians meet us
again in the inscriptions and papyri of Egypt.
Originally the
trinity was a triad like those we find in Babylonian mythology.
The triad consisted of a divine father, wife, and son. The father became
the son and the son the father through all time, and of both alike the
mother was but another form.
It is from the pagan
mystery religions that the Greek philosophers developed the idea of
Logos:
The New International Dictionary of New
Testament Theology,
Volume 3, page 1085
Among the systems offering an explanation of the world in terms of the
logos,
there are the Mystery Religions. These cultic communities did not see
their task as lying in the communication of knowledge of a scientific
nature, but of mysteries to their initiates who strove for purification
in the recurrent enactment of sacred actions. The Foundation for these
cultic actions was Sacred Text. Among them were the cults of Dionysus,
the Pytha-goreans, and the Orphic Mysteries. By means of these cults,
non Greek thought, such as in the Isis-Osiris Mysteries, which Osiris
the logos
created by Isis is the spiritual image of the world. Similarly in the
cult of Hermes, Hermes informed his son Tat in the Sacred Text belonging
to the cult, how by God's mercy, he became
logos,
and thus a son of God. As such, he (Hermes) brought regulation and form
into world, but himself remained a mediating being between God and
matter, on one side, and God and man on the other.
The logos
can also, however, appear as the son of Hermes, resulting in a triple
(trinity) gradation: God (who is Zeus), Son (Hermes), and LOGOS.
It was through
syncretism that we have the word “Logos”
or “Word” written in our English Bibles instead of “The
Spoken Promise / Plan of Yahuah”
which is what the word Logos means in Greek and Debar in Hebrew! Neither
word means “in the flesh”:
For more information on this topic, please read my book
Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit
which is a full vindication of The Spirit of
Truth vs. The Spirit of the Antichrist which is Incarnation.
Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit by Rav Sha’ul
In
this chapter of Revelation, Yahusha rides in with the “shem” or
title/name written on his banner “King of Kings and Lord of Lords”.
Putting that sound bite back into context, we see that in context
Yahusha has many crown, a crown for each title he holds… we know Yahusha
has many “titles” or “names” which in Hebrew means “reputation”… we are
not talking about his personal name, Revelation 19:12 is speaking of his
titles.
https://yhwhisone.wordpress.com/2016/07/29/the-hebrew-word-shem-meaning/
3.A more common meaning of the
word for “name” in Hebrew (SHEM) in the Bible is ‘the essential reality
of who someone is’, as in Proverbs 21:24. “A proud and haughty person’s
SHEM is scorner.” In Exodus 34:14 we read,” Yahuah, Whose SHEM is
jealous, is a jealous Elohim.” In a more famous example, the prophet
Isaiah gave Messiah’s SHEM as being
• “Wonderful,
• Counselor,
• the Image of Mighty EL,
• the Father of Everlasting Life,
• the Ruler of Heaven.” (Isaiah
9:5-6)
He certainly is all of those, and
they are some of His royal titles, but none of them are His Name. The
plural form of SHEM is SHMOT. The Bible has many SHMOT for Elohim which
are royal titles and revelations of the reality of Who He is, but not
names as such. In Biblical Hebrew, to trust in Someone’s SHEM means to
trust Him because of Who He is. To bless Someone’s SHEM means to bless
Him because of Who He is. Now before we proceed to idioms, would you
like to work a small puzzle? Here it is: Untangle the visual pun in
Revelation 19:16:“And on his robe and on his thigh (banner-correct
translation ) He has His SHEM written: KING OF KINGS, AND MASTER OF
MASTERS.”
